In March 2014, Ellen DeGeneres took a 'selfie' at the Oscars which was re-tweeted enough to win a $3 million prize from Samsung, half of which Ellen donated to HSUS to help end Canada's seal hunt.
After this 'selfie', some Inuit and their supporters decided to post 'sealfies', pictures of themselves in sealskin coats and with seals they've killed.
This was just one of the efforts to confound the commercial seal hunt with Inuit sealing.
Funds awarded by Nunavut government (CAN$) |
Recipient and purpose |
---|---|
29,759 | Sum of three awards to three individuals for 2 seal skin sewing workshops and one "seal celebration" event |
20,000 | Town of Igloolik seal hunting project |
20,000 | Town of Igloolik walrus hunting project |
15,643 | Nunavut arts and crafts association to help seal skin designers promote their products |
10,297 | University of Mannitoba for a ringed seal "IQ knowledge study" |
Funds awarded by Nunavut government (CAN $) |
Recipient and purpose |
---|---|
9,020 | Ilisaqsivik Society for a seal skin cleaning workshop |
40,000 | To Kitikmeot Inuit Association for "Kitikmeot Men's Hunting Stories" |
1,112,768 | Several "Country Food Distribution Programs" Note: "Country Food" refers to meat from wildlife, including seals and caribou. |
61,917 | Several hunting and trapping associations in Nunavut for "Commercial Harvester's Assistance." |
35,521,340 | "Social Assistance Payments" given to individuals |
Funds awarded by Nunavut government (CAN$) |
Recipient and purpose |
---|---|
29,759 | Sum of three awards to three individuals for 2 seal skin sewing workshops and one "seal celebration" event |
20,000 | Town of Igloolik seal hunting project |
20,000 | Town of Igloolik walrus hunting project |
15,643 | Nunavut arts and crafts association to help seal skin designers promote their products |
10,297 | University of Mannitoba for a ringed seal "IQ knowledge study" |
Funds awarded by Nunavut government (CAN $) |
Recipient and purpose |
---|---|
9,020 | Ilisaqsivik Society for a seal skin cleaning workshop |
40,000 | To Kitikmeot Inuit Association for "Kitikmeot Men's Hunting Stories" |
1,112,768 | Several "Country Food Distribution Programs" Note: "Country Food" refers to meat from wildlife, including seals and caribou. |
61,917 | Several hunting and trapping associations in Nunavut for "Commercial Harvester's Assistance." |
35,521,340 | "Social Assistance Payments" given to individuals |
Modern Inuit culture includes traditional hunting and gathering in addition to consumption of foods transported from the south. Inuit consume sodas, processed foods, breads, and meats bought from grocery stores.
Today, Inuit work in mining, the petroleum industry, construction, tourism, government, and other occupations. All Inuit communities now have high speed internet access.
Some Inuit also earn a living as artisans, creating stone sculptures, fabric wall hangings, jewelry, and paintings. The former mining town of Rankin Inlet has a thriving artisan community.
A subsistence way of life or subsistence economy is not based on money. Rather, it is based on noncommercial, traditional hunting and gathering for personal use such as food, clothing, shelter, and fuel. This way of life can include barter and sharing, but not commercial trade (export and import).
Today, the Inuit do not live the traditional subsistence lifestyle. With wooden houses, grocery stores, ATV's, snowmobiles, and other modern amenities and a money-based economy, the subsistence economy is a relic of the past.
The Inuit do, however, engage in 'subsistence-like' or traditional hunting - hunting of adult seals and using all parts themselves or sharing with their community. The flesh of seals and other wildlife still provide a substantial portion of the Inuit's daily calories (though significantly less for younger Inuit than older Inuit).
Nevertheless, when some Inuit kill seals, especially young seals, for the purpose of selling skins commercially or to export their skins to foreign countries, they are not engaging in subsistence hunting.
The Inuit Council (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami) (along with the Norwegian fur company G. C. Rieber and Sons, the Fur Institute of Canada, Nu Tan Furs / Atlantic Marine Products, and others) have claimed that the EU ban on seal product imports violates the Inuits' human rights.
The EU ban on seal product imports specifically exempts products obtained by Inuit, if they meet certain criteria.
So why has the Inuit council claimed that the European Union's ban on imports of seal products, which excludes products from seals killed by Inuit, violates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)?Their lawsuit claimed that the ban "unduly limits the subsistence possibilities of the applicants, relegating their economic activities to traditional hunting methods and subsistence."
One might first question what could be wrong with limiting "subsistence possibilities" to subsistence. But putting aside the odd wording, the next question one might ask is why exports of seal skins by Inuit would even be exempt from the EU ban, given that this trade is inconsistent with a subsistence economy and with the traditions of the Inuit.
Nevertheless, the Inuit have a more well defined exemption, as of 2015, as decribed in the EU amendment, but the group lost their lawsuit.
The ECHR protects people's right to property, privacy, speech and expression while maintaining that nations can restrict personal freedoms when necessary.
The Inuit's rights would not be infringed by prohibiting seal skin imports into the EU, even if this ban were to include skins obtained by Inuit. The Inuit have maintained that they have the right to continue their traditional subsistence hunting, even though they no longer live in a subsistence economy. The Canadian government has granted the Inuit this right. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans sets quotas on the number of seals that sealers in the commercial seal hunt can kill, but Inuit and other Aboriginal people are exempt from these quotas.
Selling seal skins to the EU is not a basic human right nor is it consistent with subsistence hunting. Being able to command high prices for seal skins sold to the EU is certainly not a basic human right. For the Inuit to claim that, by reducing the market value of the pelts, the ban has infringed upon their rights is nothing short of ridiculous.